Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Even at 5-8, Bears have slim playoffs hopes
Here is a scenerio that might happen and would get the Bears into the playoffs:
Bears win remaining 3 games (at Minnesota, at Green Bay, New Orleans)
Redskins loses at Minnesota, vs. Dallas, at NY Giants
Panthers loses vs. Dallas, vs. Seattle, at Tampa Bay
Vikings loses vs. Bears and at Denver, wins vs. Washington
Arizona loses at New Orleans and vs. St. Louis, wins vs. Atlanta
Lions loses at San Diego and at Green Bay, wins vs. Kansas City
Saints loses at Bears, wins against Arizona and Philadelphia
Eagles loses at Saints and at Cowboys, wins vs. Buffalo
NFC Wild Card Standing:
1. NY Giants
2. BEARS (8-8)
------------------
Vikings (8-8)---division record tie-breaker
Saints (8-8)----head-to-head tie-breaker
Cardinals (7-9)
Lions (7-9)
Redskins (6-10)
Eagles (6-10)
Panthers (5-11)
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
Bears have better than slim playoff hopes
The Bears main goal right now is to get back to .500 (7-7)
Bears play the Redskins on Thursday and then have nearly 2 weeks to prepare for the Viking on MNF. I think the Bears can win both games. The Redskins will be emotional unprepared for Thursday's game and just suffered a tough loss to the Buffalo Bills. The Bears are angry and can't wait to let off their angry on the Redskins. As for the Minnesota game, like I said the Bears will have about 11 days to prepare. They have already faced the Vikings once and that helps. The Bears have to figure out how to stop Adrian Peterson. Putting 8 men in the box might be able to stop him. The Bears should let the Vikings try to beat them with their weak passing attack. Adrian Peterson beat the Bears by himself in the last meeting. The Vikings would have lost without him. If the Bears take him out of the game, the Bears will win.
Upcoming schedules (possible results):
Detroit Lions schedule:
Sun 12/9 Dallas 1:00 pm LOSS
Sun 12/16 at San Diego 4:15 pm LOSS
Arizona Cardinals schedule:
Sun 12/9 at Seattle 4:05 pm LOSS
Sun 12/16 at New Orleans 1:00 pm LOSS
Carolina Panthers schedule:
Sun 12/9 at Jacksonville 1:00 pm LOSS
Sun 12/16 Seattle 1:00 pm LOSS
Washington Redskins schedule:
Thu 12/6 Chicago 8:15 pm LOSS
Sun 12/16 at NY Giants 8:15 pm LOSS
New Orleans Saints schedule:
Mon 12/10 at Atlanta 8:30 pm WIN
Sun 12/16 Arizona 1:00 pm WIN
Minnesota Vikings schedule:
Sun 12/9 at San Francisco 4:05 pm WIN
Mon 12/17 Chicago 8:30 pm LOSS
New York Giants schedule:
Sun 12/9 at Philadelphia 1:00 pm LOSS
Sun 12/16 Washington 8:15 pm WIN
Here is the NFC Wild Card Standings after 14 games:
1. NY Giants (9-5)
2. New Orleans Saints (7-7)
--------------------------
Chicago Bears (7-7)
Minnesota Vikings (7-7)
Arizona Cardinals (6-8)
Detroit Lions (6-8)
Philadelphia Eagles (6-8)
If the standings gets to that point, Bears control their own destiny. Wins against GB and the Saints would get them into the playoffs as the 2nd wild card team.
Thursday, November 1, 2007
Why I want Kobe Bryant in a Bulls Jersey
In the 9 years since Michael Jordan played his last game with the Bulls, the closest player the Bulls came to having a superstar was Jalen Rose. The Bulls don't get respect because no one knows any of the players. Ben Wallace might be a recognizable name but he is more well-known for his afro or his fight with Ron Artest. I wonder how many ordinary fans know about Wallace's defensive ability. Kobe Bryant is well-known for all the right reasons. He is one of the best scorers in the NBA and he has 3 championships. He is the only active player to score 81 points in a game. Michael Jordan never scored 81 points in a game! Bryant is so famous that his 4 letter first name, Kobe, is recognizable. You tell someone that Kobe scored 34 points, everyone knows which Kobe you are talking about. Sure the Bulls have players that can be identified by their first name. They got players whose names are Thabo, Tryus, Jokiam, and Luol. The problem is, Bulls fans are the only fans who know the last name of those players. You think Luol Deng is a superstar? How many times is his name mentioned on ESPN? Why do fans want their team to win championships? It's because they want the nation to pay more attention to their city. The L.A. Galaxy got David Beckham this year. Did they think he'd be a good contributer? Maybe, but they'd be lying if they didn't think Beckham to draw attention to their team. I'm sure many people had not even heard of the L.A. Galaxy before Beckham joined the team.
Will Kobe get the Bulls a championship? I don't know. But the Bulls have a chance to get the best player in the NBA. We as fans will have the opportunity to see a NBA superstar 3-4 times a week. ESPN and other media outlets will be talking about what happened in Chicago not what is going on in LA or New York. I have been to about 2 Bulls games but I never saw Michael Jordan play in person. I am going to a Bulls game in December. This could be my only opportunity to witness a live performance by a future NBA hall of famer. The Bulls have to make this trade. I'm tired of the Chicago Bulls not getting the attention they deserve, less than a decade after they were the greatest team in the world. The Bulls no longer have Jordan and the Cubs no longer have Sammy Sosa. It's time for Chicago to have a superstar. I don't care what it costs. I want Kobe Bryant on the Bulls more than an Eastern conference title, which is the farthest this Bulls team will go in the playoffs.
Thursday, September 20, 2007
Week 3: Bears-Cowboys Match-up
Rex Grossman vs. Tony Romo
Romo has been playing much better than Rex.
EDGE: COWBOYS
Running Back:
Cedric Benson vs. Julius Jones/Marion Barber
The Cowboys have duo running backs and together they'll probably be more productive than Benson.
EDGE: COWBOYS
Wide Receivers:
Moose Muhammad, Bernard Berrian vs. Terrell Owens, Sam Hurd/Patrick Crayton
Of course T.O. is an All-Pro, but the loss of Terry Glenn makes the Cowboys seem like a team with only one WR. The Bears could double team T.O. and force Romo to throw to Hurd and Crayton who aren't as good as Glenn.
EDGE: EVEN
Tight End:
Desmond Clark/Greg Olsen vs. Jason Witten
Witten has a touchdown and that gives him the edge.
EDGE: COWBOYS
Defensive Ends:
Mark Anderson, Adewale Ogunleye vs. Marcus Spears, Chris Canty
No debate here.
EDGE: BEARS
Defensive Tackles:
Tommie Harris, Darwin Walker vs. Jay Ratliff
Um..let me think...
EDGE: BEARS
Linebackers:
Lance Briggs, Brian Urlacher, Hunter Hillenmeyer vs. Anthony Spencer, Bradie James, Akin Ayodele, DeMarcus Ware
Briggs and Urlacher have 35 total tackles and 2 sacks. The Cowboys starting linebackers have 26 total tackles and 1 sack.
EDGE: BEARS
Cornerbacks:
Nathan Vasher, Peanut Tillman vs. Nate Jones/Terence Newman, Anthony Henry
EDGE: BEARS
Safeties:
Danieal Manning, Adam Archuleta vs. Roy Williams, Kem Hamlin
The Cowboys safeties are actually pretty good.
EDGE: EVEN
I'm not longer doing Special Teams because I'm assuming no team has a better Special Teams unit than the Bears.
Keys to Victory:
- Big game for Rex
Rex has to have less interceptions and needs to pass for more yards.
- Throw the deep ball
The Bears should go deep to Berrian on Sunday. It worked last year so why won't it work this year?
- No turnovers
I'll make this prediction: If the Bears make no turnovers, they will win the game.
- Pressure Romo
In this week's Sports Illustrated, Paul Zimmerman said, "If the Cowboys can block the Bears' rush, I see decent numbers for Romo and a Dallas win over the defending NFC champs."
I assume that if the Bears can get to Romo, they should be able to win.
Week 2: Bears vs. Chiefs
Kansas City Chiefs 10
The Good:
- Bears RB Cedric Benson ran for 101 yards on 24 carries.
- KR/PR Devin Hester returned a punt 73 yards for a touchdown. Hester had 5 punt returns for a total of 143 yards. He was named NFC Special Teams Player of the Week.
- LB Lance Briggs had 12 total tackles (11 solo), 1 sack, 1 forced fumble, 1 fumble recovery, and a defected pass. I would say that's a good game.
- MLB Brian Urlacher had 9 total tackles (8 solo) and had his first sack since 2005.
- John St. Clair, a reserve offensive lineman, caught a 2 yard touchdown pass.
The Bad:
- QB Rex Grossman threw two interceptions.
- The O-line allowed three sacks.
- The Bears had three turnovers, but the Chiefs only scored three points off turnovers.
- The offense scored only 13 points and three points were thanks to Hester whose punt return got the Bears to the Chiefs 18 yard line.
Why the Bears won:
Grossman wasn't much better and the Bears had a lot of turnovers. What was the difference? More points. The Bears had three points last week and scored 20 points this week. The key reason was Devin Hester who scored a touchdown and helped set up a field goal.
Player of the Week: Devin Hester- 143 punt return yards, 28.6 PR AVG., 1 TD
You're better than that player of the week: Rex Grossman- 20-34 160 yards 1 TD 2 INT
Thursday, September 13, 2007
Week 2: Bears-Chiefs Match-up
Rex Grossman vs. Damon Huard
Huard passed for only 168 yards last week against the weak Houston Texans. Rex Grossman is going against a defense that was 18th against the pass in 2006 and Huard is going against the Bears defense that made Phillip Rivers look like an ordinary QB, not an AFC pro bowler.
EDGE: BEARS
Running Back:
Cedric Benson vs. Larry Johnson
Even though Cedric Benson could likely end up with more rushing yards on Sunday than Johnson, Johnson is the better RB.
EDGE: CHIEFS
Tight End:
Desmond Clark vs. Tony Gonzalez
If Antonio Gates is the #1 TE in the NFL then it is very possible that Gonzalez is #2 or #1a.
EDGE: CHIEFS
Wide Receivers:
Bernard Berrian, Moose Muhammad vs. Samie Parker, Dwayne Bowe
Bears catch a break with Chiefs starting WR Eddie Kennison not playing on Sunday with an injury. Bowe is a rookie and Parker scored one TD last year.
EDGE: BEARS
Defensive Tackles:
Darwin Walker, Tommie Harris vs. Alfonso Boone, Ron Edwards
Haha, this is should be a good match-up for the Bears. Boone is an ex-Bear that the Bears got rid of because guys like Harris and Dusty Dvoracek were better. Edwards had 2.5 sacks last year but still nowhere near as impressive as Harris and Walker.
EDGE: BEARS
Defense Ends:
Adewale Ogunleye, Mark Anderson vs. Tamba Hali, Jimmy Wilkerson
Hali had 8 sacks in '06, but Wilkerson, playing in his 5th season, has 0.5 career sacks. Anderson and Ogunleye already have one sack each.
EDGE: BEARS
Linebackers:
Lance Briggs, Brian Urlacher, Hunter Hillenmeyer vs. Derrick Johnson, Napoleon Harris, Donnie Edwards
The trio of Johnson, Harris, and Edwards is an impressive one that combined for 275 tackles and 9.5 sacks. The Bears trio had only 44 more tackles and 8.5 less sacks. I'll give the Bears the
edge but it's only a slight one.
EDGE: BEARS
Cornerbacks:
Nathan Vasher, Peanut Tillman vs. Ty Law, Patrick Surtain or Benny Sapp
Surtain is listed as the Chiefs 2nd CB on the depth chart but didn't play last sunday. About 4 years ago, I would have given the edge to KC, but Sustain and Law are now both in their 30's and they won't be as big of an impact as Nate and Peanut.
EDGE: BEARS
Safeties:
Adam Archuleta, Danieal Manning vs. Jarrad Page, Bernard Pollard
Bears are better even without Mike Brown. Page and Pollard combined for 45 tackles in '06.
Archuleta alone had 60 tackles last season.
EDGE: BEARS
Punters:
Brad Maynard vs. Dustin Colquitt
Colquitt had a 44.3 punt avg. last season. Maynard's avg. was 44.2.
EDGE: EVEN
Kickers:
Robbie Gould vs. Justin Medlock
Medlock is a rookie. Gould made the pro bowl last season.
EDGE: BEARS
Kick/Punt returners:
Danieal Manning, Devin Hester vs. Jeff Webb, Eddie Drummond
Webb and Drummond are both decent returners but neither of them have the same impact as Hester.
EDGE: BEARS
KEYS TO VICTORY:
- Pass more, run less
The Bears gave Benson his shot and he did ok. The Bears need to throw the deep ball. They'll get more yards and score more points. Grossman should throw to Hester or Berrian. Law and Sustain are not as young as they used to be and might have lost a step. This Chiefs defense should be much easier than the Chargers defense
- Protect the football
Turnovers are the reason why the Bears lost last week and if they do it again this week, they could easily lose the Chiefs. If you don't think so, think back to last year with the 2 games against Miami and Green Bay on New Year's Eve. There are no guaranteed wins. I'm not saying be conservative. The last thing the Bears want is a defensive struggle like last week. Benson has to handle the ball with 2 hands, Berrian has to run his routes, and Grossman has got to make smart decisions. The Bears can be aggressive and still be able to not turn the ball over.
- O-line has to protect Rex
Grossman struggled last week because he was getting pressured. If Grossman has time in the pocket, he'll have a great game.....I guarantee it.
- Force turnovers
Even though the offense should do their job, it would be great if the Bears get a bunch of takeaways. The Bears offense does a lot better starting from the OPP. 45 yard line instead of their own 20 yard line.
- Get Hester involved
The Chiefs secondary seems mediocre at best. The punter won't kick it to Hester, so Grossman has got to find a way to get him the ball on offense.
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
Week 1: Bears at Chargers
Bears 3
Good:
- Mike Brown had 2 takeaways: an interception and a fumble recovery.
- Adewale Ogunleye, Mark Anderson, and Nathan Vasher had sacks.
- Tommie Harris forced a fumble.
- The Bears Defense held LaDainian Tomlinson to 25 yards rushing.
Bad:
- Four turnovers (Grossman INT, McGowan fumble, Benson fumble, Peterson fumble)
- Cedric Benson had only 42 rushing yards.
Why the Bears lost:
Turnovers is why the Bears lost. The Chargers got all their points of turnovers. If the Bears were to protect the football better then they could of won. The punt that bounced off Brandon McGowan is what really lost the momentum and the game for the Bears.
Friday, August 31, 2007
Preseason Week 4: Chicago Bears vs. Cleveland Browns
The Good:
- Bears QB Chris Leak was impressive. Leak was 11-16 for 88 yards and one touchdown. Too bad there is no room for him on this Bears team.
- Bears RB Garrett Wolfe was outstanding. He only average 1.8 yards per carry rushing the ball, but he caught 6 passes for 53 yards and he made a couple defensive players completely miss him when trying to tackle Wolfe.
- Bears WR Mike Hass made only one catch but it was a great touchdown grab that is being called the Bears' catch of the preseason.
- Bears WR David Ball is unlikely to make the cut but he had a solid game. Ball had 4 catches for 40 yards including an amazing one-handed catch in the end zone, but unfortunately Ball landed out of bounds and the catch was ruled incomplete. Hass scored on the next play.
- After being down 19-3 at halftime, the defense prevented the Browns from scoring any more points.
- Bears rookie CB Trumaine McBride led the Bears with 8 tackles.
The Bad:
- Bears QB Brian Griese was only 1-3 for 12 yards in limited action, but what disappointed me the most was that he had WR Mark Bradley open twice and he overthrew him both times.
- The Bears special teams allowed 9 points. Bears safety and kick returner Danieal Manning fumbled a kick-off out of bounds in the Bears end zone for a safety. Browns' punt returner Josh Cribbs returned a punt 70 yards for a touchdown.
Why the Bears lost:
The Browns made fewer mistakes than the Bears and that is one of the big reasons the Browns won. The Bears can't be allowing safeties and punt returns for touchdowns. Plays like that lose games. The Bears also hurt themselves by making 3 mistakes on offense that cost them at least a field goal:
- Bears QB Kyle Orton had the Bears at the Browns' 44 yard line when he threw an interception on 1st down. 14 more yards and they would have been in Bears kicker Robbie Gould's field goal range.
- Leak had the Bears at the Browns' 23 yard line and was then sacked for -12 yards. Gould's 53 yard field goal attempt on the next play was no good.
- Leak had the Bears at the Browns' 36 yard line and it was 1st down. Leak's next pass was intercepted.
What hurt the Bears was special teams mistakes and drive killing plays on offense. Also, Browns punter Dave Zastudil did a great job at punting the ball inside the Bears' 10 yard line making it hard to score.
Sunday, June 17, 2007
Kobe to the Bulls?
Bryant could also veto a trade if he thinks the team has to give up too many players, which, the sources said, could also make a trade more difficult.
Monday, April 16, 2007
Chicago Cubs Week-in-Review: April 9-15
4/9 vs. Houston Astros L 3-5
4/10 vs. Houston Astros L 2-4
4/11 vs. Houston Astros Postponed (expected to be made up on July 12)
4/13 vs. Cincinnati Reds L 5-6
4/14 vs. Cincinnati Reds W 7-0
4/15 vs. Cincinnati Reds L 0-1
Cubs overall record: 4-7 (6th in NL Central)
Notable Season Stats (as of Monday April 16):
Derrek Lee: .372 AVG 6 R 5 2B 8 RBI
Aramis Ramirez: .406 AVG 5 R 1 2B 1 HR 5 RBI
Alfonso Soriano: .234 AVG 5 R 6 2B 1 RBI
Cliff Floyd: .276 AVG 29 AB 4 R 2 2B 2 RBI
Rich Hill: 2 GS 2-0 0.64 ERA 14 IP 4 BB 11 K
Ted Lilly: 3 GS 1-1 2.37 ERA 19 IP 3 BB 24 K
Carlos Zambrano: 3 GS 1-2 7.88 ERA 16 IP 11 BB 10 K
Ryan Dempster: 5 GP 0-0 0.00 ERA 2 SV 5.0 IP 1 BB 8 K
Player of the Week: Rich Hill
1 GS 7 IP 3 H 0 ER 4 BB 5 K
Important Fact of the Week: Cubs are 1-4 at home this season.
Lou Piniella
It was only the 2nd week of the season and Lou is already losing his temper.
Postgame comments by Cubs manager Lou Piniella after the Cubs blew a five run lead and ended up losing 6-5 to the Cincinnati Reds on Friday April 13:
-"This guy (Zambrano) is your ace, you got a 5-0 lead with the eighth and ninth hitters coming up, you feel pretty good about that inning and all of a sudden it turns into a six-run inning."
- "What do I do? I pitch him when it's his turn again. What else can I do?"
-"And then I bring in the reliever (Will Ohman) who's throwing 30-to-40-foot curveballs to boot. I can see. I can start to see some of the ways this team has lost ballgames. I can see it. We've got to correct it obviously. ... This game here is one that got away from us that really shouldn't."
-When asked what's not working:
"What the hell do you think isn't working? You see the damn game."
If Lou is going to be this upset in April, how will he act in July?
Carlos Zambrano
Carlos Zambrano has been struggling. Zambrano has allowed 17 hits and 14 earned runs in 16 innings. Zambrano's WHIP (walks plus hits per inning) is 1.75, which higher than the Cubs' WHIP average of 1.14. Zambrano struggled in April last season.
Zambrano in April 2006:
6 GS 0-2 5.35 ERA 33.2 IP 33 H 20 ER 25 BB 38 K 1.72 WHIP
Hopefully he will improve later in the season.
Rich Hill
Zambrano is still the ace of the Cubs, but not by much. Rich Hill has been pitching great and has a 0.64 ERA after two starts. Hill has a chance at making the NL All-Star team and I predict that he will win at least 16 games this season.
Cubs Lack of Offense
So far the offense has been disappointing. This is an offense that could potentially have three players hitting 40+ home runs this year. The Cubs have scored three runs or less in 5 of their 11 games and have scored four runs or less in 7 of their 11 games. The Cubs lack of hitting is one of the main reasons the Cubs are 4-7.
Thursday, April 5, 2007
Chicago Cubs week-in-review: April 2-8
4/2 L 1-5 @ Cincinnati Reds Box Score
4/4 W 4-1 @ Cincinnati Reds Box Score
4/5 L 2-5 @ Cincinnati Reds Box Score
4/6 W 9-3 @ Milwaukee Brewers Box Score
4/7 W 6-3 @ Milwaukee Brewers Box Score
4/8 L 4-9 @ Milwaukee Brewers Box Score
Cubs overal record: 3-3 (tied for 3rd in the NL central)
Notable Season Stats at the end of the week:
Derrek Lee: .440 AVG 4 R 3 2B 3 RBI
Aramis Ramirez: .440 AVG 4 R 1 HR 4 RBI
Mark DeRosa: .333 AVG 7 R 2 HR 6 RBI
Alfonso Soriano: .214 AVG 2 R 4 2B
Michael Barrett: .158 AVG 1 R 3 RBI
Carlos Zambrano: 1-1 6.00 ERA 12 IP 8 K
Ted Lilly: 1-0 1.29 ERA 7 IP 9 K
Jason Marquis: 0-0 1.50 ERA 6 IP 1 K
Rich Hill: 1-0 1.29 ERA 7 IP 6 K
Wade Miller: 0-1 13.50 ERA 4 IP 0 K
Scott Eyre: 0-0 22.50 ERA 2 GP 2 IP 3 K
Ryan Dempster: 0-0 0.00 ERA 2 GP 2 IP 3 K
Player of the Week: Aramis Ramirez
Important Fact of the Week: Cubs are 3-1 when scoring 4 or more runs
The Cubs started the season with a record of 1-2 after the Cubs' offense only scored seven runs in the first three games. The Cubs had a good shot at winning two out of three against the Reds in the final game of the series, but Bob Howry blew a 2-1 lead in the 7th and Reds eventually won 5-2. Against the Brewers, the Cubs' offense did better and averaged 6.33 runs per game during the three game series. After winning the first two games, Wade Miller had a bad game in the final game of the series allowing six runs in only four innings and the Brewers won 9-4 on Easter Sunday.
Player Notes:
Carlos Zambrano
Zambrano has shown that he can't pitch well on opening day:
Opening Day 2007: 5 IP 6 H 5 ER 5 BB 2 SO 2 HR
Opening Day 2006: 4.2 IP 7 H 5 ER 5 BB 5 SO 2 HR
Opening Day 2005: 4.2 IP 7 H 3 ER 4 BB 8 SO 1 HR
Could it be a fluke that Zambrano pitches bad on opening day? Maybe. However, I think he gets too excited on opening day. It is probably hard to be the first pitcher of the first game of the season. If Zambrano struggles during opening day, how will he do in the playoffs?
Zambrano in the 2003 playoffs:
2 GS 0-1 5.40 ERA 16.7 IP 5 BB 12 SO
Those aren't great stats. If the Cubs reach game 7 of the world series, they might have to consider maybe having someone other than Zambrano start.
Ted Lilly
Great game for Lilly during the Cubs 4-1 win over the Reds on April 4th:
(W) 7 IP 3 H 1 ER 1 BB 9 SO
This is why the Cubs got him and I hope he can be a 15 game winner with a sub-4 ERA.
Rich Hill
In the first five innings of Hill's first start on April 6th, Hill allowed no hits and no walks. Hill pitched seven innings, allowed just one hit which was a home run ending his bid for a perfect game and a shutout, and walked zero batters. If Hill can keep it up, he has a chance at being a NL All-Star this year.
Mark DeRosa
I was hoping he would be good but I didn't expect him to be leading the Cubs in home runs after the first week of the season. So far, he is hitting better than Alfonso Soriano. DeRosa ranks 1st on the Cubs in home runs and RBIs and rank 3rd on the Cubs in batting average. I don't expect him to hit 40 home runs, but he is off to a great start.
Thursday, March 15, 2007
What will the Bulls' seed be when the playoffs start?
NOTE: I have not included the Toronto Raptors, who are currently the #4 seed. After looking at their remaining schedule, I don't think they will win as many games as the Bulls so it would be meaningless to try to predict their record. The reason the Raptors are #4 even though the Bulls are better is because they are leading their division and the Bulls are not. Division leaders are guaranteed a top 4 seed. I think the Raptors will win their division, so if the Bulls can not finish better than the Detroit Pistons and the Cleveland Cavaliers the Bulls will have a lower seed than the Raptors.
Detriot Pistons: Currently 41-22
Mar 16 at Phoenix- L
Mar 18 vs Dallas- L
Mar 20 vs Philadelphia- W (42)
Mar 22 at Houston- L
Mar 23 at San Antonio- L
Mar 25 at Milwaukee- W (43)
Mar 26 vs Denver- W (44)
Mar 29 at Chicago- L
Mar 30 vs New Jersey- W (45)
Apr 1 vs Miami- W (46)
Apr 3 at Indiana- W (47)
Apr 4 vs Chicago- L
Apr 8 vs Cleveland- W (48)
Apr 9 at New York- W (49)
Apr 11 vs Orlando- W (50)
Apr 13 at Toronto- W (51)
Apr 15 vs Philadelphia- W (52)
Apr 17 vs Toronto- W (53)
Apr 18 at Boston- W (54)
Predicted Record: 54-28
Cleveland Cavaliers: Currently 40-25
Mar 17 vs Utah- L
Mar 20 at Charlotte- W (41)
Mar 21 vs Dallas- L
Mar 23 vs New York- W (42)
Mar 25 vs Denver- W (43)
Mar 27 at Indiana- W (44)
Mar 28 at New York- W (45)
Mar 31 at Chicago- L
Apr 1 at Boston- W (46)
Apr 3 at Minnesota- W (47)
Apr 5 vs Miami- W (48)
Apr 6 at Washington- L
Apr 8 at Detroit- L
Apr 12 vs New Jersey- W (49)
Apr 14 vs Atlanta- W (50)
Apr 17 at Philadelphia- W (51)
Apr 18 vs Milwaukee- W (52)
Predicted Record: 52-30
Washington Wizards: Currently 35-28
Mar 17 vs New Orl/OKC- W (36)
Mar 20 at Portland- W (37)
Mar 21 at Seattle- W (38)
Mar 23 at Golden State- W (39)
Mar 24 at LA Clippers- W (40)
Mar 26 at Utah- L
Mar 28 vs Philadelphia- W (41)
Mar 30 vs Toronto- L
Apr 1 at Milwaukee- W (42)
Apr 3 at Charlotte- W (43)
Apr 4 vs Charlotte- W (44)
Apr 6 vs Cleveland- W (45)
Apr 7 at New Jersey- W (46)
Apr 10 vs New Jersey- W (47)
Apr 11 at Miami- L
Apr 13 at Atlanta- W (48)
Apr 15 vs Chicago- W (49)
Apr 17 vs Orlando- W (50)
Apr 18 at Indiana- W (51)
Predicted Record: 51-31
Chicago Bulls: Currently 39-28
Mar 17 at Memphis- W (40)
Mar 20 vs LA Clippers- W (41)
Mar 22 vs Denver- W (42)
Mar 25 at Indiana- W (43)
Mar 26 vs Portland- W (44)
Mar 29 vs Detroit- W (45)
Mar 31 vs Cleveland- W (46)
Apr 1 at Atlanta- W (47)
Apr 4 at Detroit- W (48)
Apr 6 vs New Jersey- W (49)
Apr 8 at Toronto- W (50)
Apr 10 vs New York- W (51)
Apr 13 vs Charlotte- W (52)
Apr 15 at Washington- L
Apr 18 at New Jersey- W (53)
Predicted Record: 53-29
Miami Heat: Currently 34-29
Mar 15 at New Jersey- W (35)
Mar 16 vs Sacramento- W (36)
Mar 18 vs Orlando- W (37)
Mar 21 at Atlanta- W (38)
Mar 23 at Indiana- W (39)
Mar 24 vs Philadelphia- W (40)
Mar 26 vs Atlanta- W (41)
Mar 28 at Toronto- L
Mar 30 at Minnesota- W (42)
Apr 1 at Detroit- L
Apr 3 vs Toronto- W (43)
Apr 5 at Cleveland- L
Apr 6 at Boston- W (44)
Apr 8 vs Charlotte- W (45)
Apr 10 at Charlotte- W (46)
Apr 11 vs Washington- W (47)
Apr 13 vs Indiana- W (48)
Apr 16 vs Boston- W (49)
Apr 18 at Orlando- W (50)
Predicted Record: 50-32
Here is my predicted playoff seeding:
1. Pistons 54-28
2. Bulls 53-27
3. Wizards 51-31
4. Raptors
5. Cavaliers 52-30
6. Heat 50-32
I have the Bulls getting the 2nd seed in the playoffs. I offer no guaranttees. It is very likely that each team will have 1-2 less wins than my predictions. There are many games each team could very easily lose, but I have picked the wins based on games they should win. For example, it can be argued that the Cleveland Cavaliers could beat the Washington Wizards on April 6. However, because the game is in Washington, I said that the Wizards would win. Now, you may notice that I have the Bulls beating the Pistons in Detroit. I picked the Bulls to win because the Bulls beat the Pistons by 17 points in their 1st meeting and then lost by 2 in Detroit after leading by as many as 16 points. I think the Bulls should beat the Pistons, because I don't think Detroit is better than the Bulls and I don't see any reason for me to believe that the Bulls will lose. I hate making predictions because I'm not always right. We'll see how close (or far away) I was at the end of the season.
Is 50 wins still realistic for the Bulls?
Here is how I did so far with my prediction (actual result in parentheses):
Feb 20 vs Atlanta- W (W)
Feb 22 at Cleveland- L (W)
Feb 23 vs Washington- W (W)
Feb 25 at Detroit- L (L)
Feb 26 vs Orlando- W (L)
Feb 28 vs Golden State- W (W)
Mar 2 vs New Orl/OKC- W (W)
Mar 4 at Milwaukee- W (W)
Mar 7 at Miami- L (L)
Mar 8 at Orlando- W (W)
Mar 11 at Boston- W (W)
Mar 13 vs Boston- W (W)
Mar 14 at Philadelphia- W (W)
Mar 17 at Memphis- W (?) (40)
Mar 20 vs LA Clippers- W (?) (41)
Mar 22 vs Denver- L (?)
Mar 25 at Indiana- W (?) (42)
Mar 26 vs Portland- W (?) (43)
Mar 29 vs Detroit- W (?) (44)
Mar 31 vs Cleveland- W (?) (45)
Apr 1 at Atlanta- W (?) (46)
Apr 4 at Detroit- L (?)
Apr 6 vs New Jersey- W (?) (47)
Apr 8 at Toronto- L (?)
Apr 10 vs New York- W (?) (48)
Apr 13 vs Charlotte- W (?) (49)
Apr 15 at Washington- L (?)
Apr 18 at New Jersey- W (?)(50)
I still have the Bulls winning 50 games. I want to make changes to my current predictions. I have decided to change my predicted losses to Denver, Detroit away, and Toronto away into wins. That would have the Bulls finishing the season with 53 wins.
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Chicago Cubs questions (and possible answers) entering the season
Pitching Questions:
#1. Will Mark Prior/Wade Miller be and stay healthy?
#2. Will Rich Hill avoid the sophomore slump and pitch as well as he did last year?
#3. Will pitching in different league turn Ted Lilly into an all-star pitcher (or at least a productive middle of the rotation pitcher)?
#4. Can Jason Marquis bounce back after having the worst season in his career?
#5. Will Ryan Dempster be the closer this year and have a ERA below four?
#6. Can Kerry Wood be effective again and stay healthy?
Hitting Questions:
#1. Can Cesar Izturis provide offense (like he did in 2004) as well as defense?
#2. Can Derrek Lee hit 45+ home runs (like he did in 2005) after he missed 100+ games last year?
#3. Will Alfonso Soriano provide great numbers again, or will the pressure of being the top player on a playoff contender cause him to have a disappointing year?
The Big Question:
Can the Cubs make it to the playoffs?
While I can't answer the questions now, here are the positive and negative answers to my questions:
I'll start with the negative answers:
Pitching answers (negative):
#1. Prior and Miller miss a lot of the season. Prior makes 12 starts and Miller has to pitch out of the bullpen after a long stay on the disabled list.
#2. The batters adjust to Hill after seeing him more and Hill has a disappointing year: 9-16, 4.87 ERA
#3. A new league doesn't produce new results for Lilly: 10-14, 4.45 ERA
#4. Marquis doesn't fix his problems and has another bad season: 8-17, 5.98 ERA
#5. Dempster loses his job as closer after failing to record saves early in the season: 4+ blown saves, 4.67 ERA
#6. Wood is unable to pitch frequently due to arm problems. Wood makes 13 appearances out of the bullpen.
Hitting answers (negative):
#1. Izturis struggles to produce offensively: .205 batting average, .245 on-base percentage
#2. Lee stats are not as good as they were in 2005: 28 home runs, .275 AVG
#3. Soriano has a good season but not as great as everyone was hoping for: 31 HR, 73 RBI, .262 AVG, .323 OBP
Negative answer to The Big Question:
Cubs finish 82-80, 3rd place in the NL central. No playoffs appearance for the Cubs in 2007.
And here are the positive answers:
Pitching questions (positive):
#1. Prior and Miller are healthy most of the season: Prior 15-8, 3.35 ERA; Miller 11-13, 4.12 ERA.
#2. Hill has an even better season than last year: 16-9, 3.34 ERA
#3. Lilly has the best season of his career because he no longer has to face good hitting AL teams: 17-11, 3.41 ERA
#4. Marquis rebounds nicely from his horrible 2006 season: 15-9, 3.81 ERA
#5. Dempster improves from last year's bad season: 35 saves, 3.12 ERA
#6. Wood is healthy and ends up being a key member of the Cubs bullpen: 73 GP, 3.24 ERA
Hitting answers (positive):
#1 Izturis hits pretty good for a #8 hitter: .282 AVG, .325 OBP
#2. Lee proves that he is 100% healthy: 41 HR, 113 RBI, .321 AVG
#3. Soriano shows that his 2006 season was no fluke: 48 HR, 102 RBI, 43 SB, .287 AVG
Positive answer to The Big Question:
Cubs win 95 games and finish 1st in the NL Central. Cubs make it to the playoffs.
My answers are just guesses and it is too early for my questions to be answer. I am hoping for the positive answers to happen, but I am worried that some or most of the negative answers will happen. The only way to find out is to watch the entire 2007 baseball season.
Thursday, February 22, 2007
Bulls may trade for Abdur-Rahim, Wells
Here is an excerpt from today's article in the Tribune titled "Bulls have eyes for Abdur-Rahim, Wells":
Kings forward Shareef Abdur-Rahim is the most prominently mentioned possibility in the latter scenario, though a late rumor Wednesday had the Bulls trying to pry Bonzi Wells from the Rockets.
A Bulls team source said Paxson wasn't optimistic but had to wait until Thursday to see if Grizzlies general manager Jerry West would lower his asking price for Gasol. That chance has been rejected categorically in public comments from West and Grizzlies owner Michael Heisley.
Paxson is active, though, and said to want a deal with his team underachieving in the winnable Eastern Conference.
P.J. Brown's expiring $8.6 million salary has drawn considerable interest, but the Bulls are keeping him in case the Gasol talks change direction Thursday. Neither team expects that to happen.
The Bulls also have the expiring deals of Michael Sweetney and Malik Allen, which could be used in a deal with the Kings. Abdur-Rahim has three years and $18.6 million left on his deal.
Wells is a post-up guard about whom coach Scott Skiles has talked favorably in the past. Off the court, Wells has been cited for criminal trespass while with the Trail Blazers and had several run-ins with coaches, including being deactivated earlier this season by Jeff Van Gundy for a lack of conditioning.
Those character issues would seem to run counter to the philosophy of an organization that has sent Tim Thomas home and J.R. Smith to the Nuggets for lesser transgressions.
Wells' $2.1 million salary is a matchable trade with Sweetney's $2.7 million deal.
Skiles met with Paxson on Wednesday morning before the team departed for Cleveland.
"As coaches, even though I know more than the average person, I still have to operate under the assumption that this is the team we're going to [have] the rest of the season," Skiles said. "If you don't do that, you're making a mistake."
Sam Smith wrote what he thinks Bulls chances are of getting either Abdur-Rahim or Wells in his column today:
The talk is that the Kings want to come out of the deal with a young player, a draft pick and salary-cap relief. They don't have all those assets, which could open the way for the Bulls to end up with Shareef Abdur-Rahim.
Wells is a post-up guard who is on the outs with the Rockets and again exhibiting unreliable behavior. His contract status, though, is favorable. He has an opt-out after this season he says he will use, and he had a great finish for the Kings last season.
Wells inexplicably rejected an offer of about $30 million to re-sign, and Wells was left to take just $2 million from the Rockets. There's a good chance he would be motivated for two months to get a new contract and could be a weapon for a team like the Bulls if they don't make a major deal. Still, the Bulls have a history of avoiding potentially difficult players such as Wells.
For two months, the Bulls probably could put up with a character. Perhaps Houston would accept salary-cap relief and a second-round pick.
I don't really want either trade to happen. Most likely the Bulls might have to trade one of their young stars: Ben Gordon, Kirk Hinrich, Chris Duhon, Luol Deng, or Andres Nocioni. Unless the Bulls can get a trade done without including those five players, I say let the trade deadline pass and stick with the players the Bulls have now. The Bulls are already a good team and my fear is that a trade could make them worse, not better.
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
Who's better: 2003 Cubs or 2007 Cubs
NOTE: The offensive starters and starting rotations I will use for the 2003 Cubs will be from the roster they had going into the playoffs. The players the Cubs acquired during the season (Kenny Lofton, Aramis Ramirez, and Randall Simon, etc) helped the Cubs get into the playoffs and into the NLCS. For the 2007 Cubs, I will create the starting line-ups and rotations using the depth chart on http://www.cubs.com/ that way I'm using an expert opinion to determine who the starters might be instead of using my opinion which will most likely end up being wrong. Stats of 2007 team are from the 2006 season.
Offensive Starters
-------------------
1st base:
Randall Simon 16 HR 72 RBI .276/.309/.434 410 AB
vs.
Derrek Lee 8 HR 30 RBI .286/.368/.474 175 AB
2nd base:
Mark Grudzielanek 3 HR 38 RBI .314/.366/.416 481 AB
vs.
Mark DeRosa 13 HR 74 RBI .296/.357/.456 520 AB
Shortstop:
Alex Gonzalez 20 HR 59 RBI .228/.295/.409 536 AB
vs.
Cezar Izturis 1 HR 18 RBI .245/.295/.318 192 AB
3rd base:
Aramis Ramirez ('03) 27 HR 106 RBI .272/.324/.465 607 AB
vs.
Aramis Ramirez ('07) 38 HR 119 RBI .291/.352/.561 594 AB
LF:
Moises Alou 22 HR 91 RBI .280/.357/.462 565 AB
vs.
Matt Murton 13 HR 62 RBI .297/.365/.444 455 AB
or
Cliff Floyd 11 HR 44 RBI .244/.324/.407 332 AB
CF.
Kenny Lofton 12 HR 46 RBI .296/.352/.450 547 AB
vs.
Alfonso Soriano 46 HR 95 RBI .277/.351/.560 647 AB
RF:
Sammy Sosa 40 HR 103 RBI .279/.358/.553 517 AB
vs.
Jacque Jones 27 HR 81 RBI .285/.334/.499 533 AB
C:
Damian Miller 9 HR 36 RBI .233/.310/.369 352 AB
vs.
Michael Barrett 16 HR 53 RBI .307/.368/.517 375 AB
Comments on the offensive starters:
It seems like the '07 team has a better offensive infield. Although Simon posted higher HR and RBI totals, notice that Lee had over 200 fewer AB. Also, Lee's AVG, OBP, and SLG are higher than Simon's. The only edge the '03 team has on the infield is Gonzalez over Izturis. Although Izturis has the higher average, Gonzalez has a better SLG and has the same OBP Izturis has. Also, DeRosa may have more power, but I think Grudzielanek may be the better hitter because he has a higher AVG and OBP. I'll say there is no edge between the two second basemen.
I have to say that the '03 team has a better hitting outfield. Soriano does have the best stats, but Alou, Sosa, and Lofton (who by the way has a better AVG and OBP than Soriano) are a better offensive group than the '07 outfield led by Soriano. Although Jones and Murton posted good numbers in '06, can they do it again in '07? I'm also worried about Floyd who had the fewest AB of the outfielders that were listed.
A big plus goes to the '07 team for having a good offensive catcher. Most teams' catchers are bottom of the order hitters, but Barrett is arguably one of the best hitting catchers in the National League. Barrett destroys Miller in AVG, OBP, and SLG and even had more AB than him.
Overall, I think the '07 team is a slightly better hitting team.
__________________________
Starting Rotation
------------------
#1:
Mark Prior ('03) 18-6 2.43 ERA 245 SO 211.3 IP
vs.
Carlos Zambrano ('07) 16-7 3.41 ERA 210 SO 214.0
#2:
Kerry Wood ('03) 14-11 3.20 ERA 266 SO 211.0 IP
vs.
Ted Lilly 15-13 4.31 ERA 160 SO 181.2 IP
#3:
Carlos Zambrano ('03) 13-11 3.11 ERA 168 SO 214.0 IP
vs.
Jason Marquis 14-16 6.02 ERA 96 SO 194.1 IP
#4:
Matt Clement 14-12 4.11 ERA 171 SO 201.7 IP
vs.
Rich Hill 6-7 4.17 ERA 77 SO 99.1 IP
#5:
Shawn Estes 8-11 5.73 ERA 103 SO 152.3 IP
vs.
Mark Prior ('07) 1-6 7.21 ERA 38 SO 43.2 IP
or
Wade Miller 0-2 4.57 ERA 20 SO 21.2 IP
Comments on the starting rotations:
Clearly the '03 team has the better starting rotation. However, the bottom of the rotation players on the '07 team could end up pitching their way into the upper half of the rotation. If healthy, Prior's stats could look more like '03 Prior and less like Estes. Hill's stats are average, but if he hadn't started the '06 season so bad, his ERA would be under four easily. I'm not sure if Miller will have a spot in the rotation, but he too could have a good season if healthy. Prior and Miller combined for 14 starts (nine for Prior and five for Miller) in 2006 so it is unfair to say that Clement and Estes were better pitchers than them just because they had better stats. I would like to see both Prior and Miller pitch 100+ innings in a season before trying to compare them to anyone.
The top half of the rotation is dominated by the '03 Cubs. Although Zambrano is a Cy Young candidate, it will be interesting to see if newcomers Lilly and Marquis are able to keep their ERA below five. Lilly is coming from the AL East that has teams like the New York Yankees and the Boston Red Sox, so I expect his ERA to be lower in 2007. Marquis is from the NL so he has less of an excuse than Lilly. Seeing that Marquis is in the same division this year as he was last year, I don't see Marquis improving as much as Lilly. The '03 team had Prior, Wood, and Zambrano at the top of the rotation and all three of them:
a.) had 14 or more wins
b.) had an ERA below 3.50
c.) pitched over 210 innings
Those achievements make them more impressive than the 2007's potential top three starting pitchers.
The '03 team had three potential #1 starters (Prior, Wood, and Zambrano) and Clement could have been easily a #2 or a #3 on another team. Overall, the '03 team had the better pitching and their pitching helped get them to the NLCS in 2003.
_______________________________
I am not going to make a prediction of who will end up being the better team. This is only a comparison. There is no way of telling whether the 2007 Cubs will finish first or last. No one knows who will get injured and who will be traded. The only way to find out is to wait until the end of the 2007 season.
Monday, February 19, 2007
Can the Bulls Win 50 Games?
Here is an excerpt from that article:
Players are giving more voice to a quietly formed goal of 50 victories, even as it appears to be slipping away.
The Bulls must go 21-7 over their final games—14 at home, 14 on the road—to meet this goal, which seemed a foregone conclusion in the giddiness after signing Ben Wallace. The way the Bulls limped into the break, with five losses in six games, suggests the task will be tall.
Poor decision-making on offense, a recent lack of focus and intensity on defense and an injury to Andres Nocioni, whose participation Monday is questionable, has left more reasons for pessimism than optimism recently.
Still, hope exists.
"This is the time of year where we've started playing really well the last two years," coach Scott Skiles said. "We're close in a lot of games to playing really well. We've had our inconsistencies. We need to come out of the gate and play well after the break and try to build some momentum."
Indeed, the Bulls have closed the last two seasons by going 21-12 after the break in 2004-05 and 18-12 last season. But improvement is needed, especially in terms of consistency. Indeed, the Bulls seem to have one prolonged stretch of inconsistency and bad play each game, from which they don't recover.
K.C. Johnson, the author of the article, said that the Bulls must improve on bench play, the transition game, and energy levels.
I have listed the Bulls remaining games. The Tribune article said the Bulls must go 21-7 to reach 50 wins (they are currently 29-25). I am going to predict the outcome of each game and see what are the Bulls chances of winning 50 games.
Feb 20 vs Atlanta- W (30)
Feb 22 at Cleveland- L
Feb 23 vs Washington- W (31)
Feb 25 at Detroit- L
Feb 26 vs Orlando- W (32)
Feb 28 vs Golden State- W (33)
Mar 2 vs New Orl/OKC- W (34)
Mar 4 at Milwaukee- W (35)
Mar 7 at Miami- L
Mar 8 at Orlando- W (36)
Mar 11 at Boston- W (37)
Mar 13 vs Boston- W (38)
Mar 14 at Philadelphia- W (39)
Mar 17 at Memphis- W (40)
Mar 20 vs LA Clippers- W (41)
Mar 22 vs Denver- L
Mar 25 at Indiana- W (42)
Mar 26 vs Portland- W (43)
Mar 29 vs Detroit- W (44)
Mar 31 vs Cleveland- W (45)
Apr 1 at Atlanta- W (46)
Apr 4 at Detroit- L
Apr 6 vs New Jersey- W (47)
Apr 8 at Toronto- L
Apr 10 vs New York- W (48)
Apr 13 vs Charlotte- W (49)
Apr 15 at Washington- L
Apr 18 at New Jersey- W (50)
Surprisingly, I have the Bulls winning 50 games and finishing at a record of 50-32. The games I think the Bulls will win are games the Bulls will probably be the favorite to win. There is a good chance the Bulls will lose some of the games I have marked down as wins, but they could also win some of the games I have marked down as losses. I am not an NBA expert, so I can not guarantee that the Bulls will win 50 games. You are just going to have to watch the remaining games and find out.
Saturday, February 17, 2007
Chicago Loses to Detriot in Shooting Stars Challenge
Here is a brief summary of the contest from http://aol.nba.com/allstar2007/shooting_stars/:
Team Detroit won the 2007 Haier Shooting Stars challenge by default as team Chicago took its shots out of order in the final round on Saturday. The team of Bill Laimbeer, Chauncey Billups and Swin Cash had the second-best first-round time by finishing the six-shot course in 1:06 and then needed just 50.5 seconds to complete its final-round run. Chicago had the best first-round time (48.9 seconds), followed by Detroit, defending champion San Antonio (1:32) and Los Angeles (2:00).
Like the summary said, Detriot had a time of 50.5 seconds in the finals. Chicago was doing good and then Gordon shot when Dupree was supposed to shoot. Chicago finished with a better time, but after the officials looked at the replays, it was announced that Chicago was disqualified and Detriot was named the winner. I'll forgive Gordon since it was only an All-Star contest, but Pippen, who made what would have been the winning shot, and Dupree are probably mad at him for costing them a chance at winning the $15,000 prize to the winner that goes to each player.
Pippen Wants to Play for Heat
Here is an excerpt from Sam Smith's article in today's Tribune:
Pippen, never shy about stating his opinions and intentions, made it clear he'd love to play for the Miami Heat.
"I'm looking at teams like Miami, Cleveland, Dallas, San Antonio. I feel there are a few teams I could help," Pippen said.
Sitting at a nearby table later on, Kobe Bryant said he'd call Pippen and ask him to consider the Lakers.
"I'd like an opportunity to help a team contend for a championship," Pippen said. "I'd like to go play with Shaq. That would be the ideal place. He's probably the best in the game, he and Dwyane Wade. Teams in the East still are bunched up, but [the Pistons and the Heat] will be fighting it out in the Eastern finals."
Though O'Neal said he hadn't heard about any Pippen interest in Miami, Wade was excited.
"I'm already playing with [Gary] Payton and Shaq; Scottie and Michael are two guys I used to play with on video games," Wade said. "To add Scottie to the mix, that would be crazy. It would be a dream."
It seems like the Chicago Bulls are not one of the teams Pippen is looking at. He wants to play for a team that is a title contender and not a team that could be a first round exit in the playoffs. Pippen said, "I don't see anyone really a threat to them." The "them" is his quote was probably the Miami Heat. Pippen said, "the Bulls still are lacking that inside presence." The Heat, unlike the Bulls, do have an inside presence: Shaquille O'Neal. Although the Heat are currently the eight seed in the Eastern conference, Pippen probably thinks they are one key player away from being a serious contender and he is hoping he is that key player. However, just because he wants to play for the teams he mentioned doesn't mean they will sign him. The Bulls are probably still a possible destination for Pippen, but it is unlikely that the Bulls will be able to sign him if Miami, Cleveland, Dallas, or San Antonio offers him a contract. The Bulls and the rest of the NBA will get a good look at Pippen tonight when he participates in the "Shooting Stars" contest during the All-Star weekend festivities.
Friday, February 16, 2007
NBA was probably right for not picking Thomas, Sefolosha
*Andrea Bargnani 21.5 points 7.0 rebounds 1.6 assists
*Paul Millsap 18.6 points 13.6 rebounds 1.9 assists
*Adam Morrison 19.2 points 4.8 rebounds 3.3 assists
*Jorge Garbajosa 14.3 points 8.6 rebounds 3.4 assists
Tyrus Thomas 16.2 points 12.9 rebounds 1.9 assists
*Jordan Farmer 15.4 points 4.8 rebounds 6.1 assists
*Randy Foye 20.4 points 6.1 rebounds 5.6 assists
*Rudy Gay 19.6 points 7.9 rebounds 2.1 assists
*Brandon Roy 21.8 points 5.9 rebounds 4.9 assists
*Marcus Williams 20.6 points 5.9 rebounds 8.7 assists
Pippen may return to the NBA
Thursday, February 15, 2007
Bulls Lose to Weak Eastern Team
On the first half of the season:“We’re probably a little ahead of schedule compared to last year. There were a couple games along the stretch I thought we could pick up. When you consider everything, I still take my hat off to the small group of guys who held us down on the road trip. We had other guys out, and we really could have been buried. Those guys stepped up, and kept us playing in Los Angeles and Denver. They saved the day for us.”
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
Atlanta's Johnson picked over Gordon, Deng
According to http://aol.nba.com/allstar2007/news/johnson_070214.html?rss=true:
Atlanta Hawks guard Joe Johnson has been named by NBA Commissioner David Stern to replace injured East All-Star Jason Kidd (back) of the New Jersey Nets on the Eastern Conference Roster for the 2007 NBA All-Star Game on Sunday, February 18 in Las Vegas.
Johnson, in his sixth NBA season, will be making his first NBA All-Star appearance.
Johnson not Deng or Gordon will
be playing for the East instead of
Jason Kidd during the All-Star
game.
Bulls comeback then lose in final seconds
Here quotes after the game provided by http://www.bulls.com:
Quoting Bulls Head Coach Scott Skiles
“We were almost able to steal it. We just did not have enough at the end. They probably deserved to win. They outplayed us for 40 minutes. I thought we came out in the second half with a lot more energy and got back in the game. We just could not get over the hump. We got it close and they took it back up to five or eight. Not until the very end were we able to get it close. We fouled, they made two free throws and we missed the last shot."
On Gordon’s shot to win it, was there contact?
"A little bit, but not enough to call it there."
There was good ball movement early, but it looked like you were a step slow:
"We were more than a step slow. Their bigs are like ours. Bargnani is like a guard. He is very skilled. Garbajosa is skilled and so is Bosh. They can put the ball on the floor and shoot threes. We tried multiple pick and rolls coverages but we couldn't stop them. Not until we went with the zone late with the small line-up did we have any success at all."
On using 11 guys in the first quarter:
"It was clear from the first four or five possessions that we were a step slow. It is understandable. I'm not mad at anybody at that point. I'm just trying to find something to get going. We need to get a lift off our bench. We are not getting enough energy and the kind of play off our bench. It hurts that we do not have Chapu (Nocioni) coming in and we are not getting enough off the bench except Chris Duhon."
Is it a challenge to go with the small line-up?
"In the last two years it is something we have had to go to. We were hoping early in the season that it was not something we would have to go to. So many teams play small now. Our turnovers and ballhandling have been questionable lately so we like the three guards out there."
On the Tyrus block at the end and the defensive effort:
"We needed to get over quicker but I can't fault the effort of our guys in the last three minutes of the game. I like the fact that the call was made if it was a foul. There are too many times that the guys hold the whistle at that time of the game. The problem is that I don't know the secret of getting the call. Tonight they got it and I like that generally. I like if a guy shoots it with a second on the clock and he gets the foul call. I think it is inconsistent sometimes."
Quoting Bulls Guard Chris Duhon
"It was tough to come all the way back at the end and even get the lead. We just couldn't get the right play at the end. We got in late last night. Even with the day off, you still feel the effects of different time zones. With us knowing we have to leave right after and go right back on the road, that can be mentally tiring as well. We played pretty well tonight, we played well enough to win. We just didn't win."
Quoting Bulls Guard Ben Gordon
"We really didn't take control of the game like we should have in the first half. To get so close and lose, I'm a little disappointed."
Was there contact on your final shot?
"Absolutely. But we didn't get the call. I don't know why. I thought they got a lucky one at the other end. That's just how the game went."
Quoting Raptors Head Coach Sam Mitchell
"The Bulls are a good basketball team. They played hard. We had the lead with two minutes to go, up by ten, and they made shots and kept getting extra shots. I kept telling my team they are not going away."
What's different about this year's Raptors team?
"We're a better basketball team. I think the record says that. We have a lot of guys who can make plays. T.J. has won some games down the stretch, Garbo (Garbajosa), Bosh, Andrea, all the guys. We're just a better basketball team. Rasho and Jose had good games, we're just a better basketball team."
Quoting Raptors Guard Anthony Parker
Late in the game, how would you have played this any differently?
"I had a decent look in the corner, Mo (Peterson) had a decent look in the corner - if one of those three's goes in, that's the icing on the cake. So I don't know if I would change anything except, of course, the turnover. I just lost the ball. It came at a funny angle and I just lost the ball. I think we played decent defense. They hit some tough shots, that's why they're a good team. To come into Chicago, on their home court after the streak they've had, is a great feeling."
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Bulls-Raptors Preview
7:30 PM
United Center
Ch: Comcast Sports Net
Bulls by 5
Probable Starters
Chicago Bulls
C. Ben Wallace
PF. Tyrus Thomas
SF. Luol Deng
SG. Ben Gordon
PG. Kirk Hinrich
Toronto Raptors
C. Rasho Nesterovic
PF. Chris Bosh
SF. Jorge Garbajosa
SG. Anthony Parker
PG. T.J. Ford
Players to Watch
Chicago Bulls
Tyrus Thomas: Thomas had 9 points, 4 rebounds, and 3 blocks in the Bulls 116-103 win over the Phoenix Suns last Sunday night. Thomas could get the start tonight if P.J. Brown hasn't fully recovered from his sore back. Toronto is ranked 29th in the league in rebounding, so Thomas has a shot getting 10+ rebounds.
Toronto Raptors
Chris Bosh: Bosh is scoring 23.2 points per game along with 10.7 rebounds per game for the Raptors. On February 7th, Bosh scored 41 points in a Raptors 113-103 win over the Orlando Magic If Brown is out, Bosh will be defended by Thomas most of the night. Bosh could have a big night if Thomas struggles to guard Bosh. Bosh is also the bigger player. Bosh is listed at 6 foot 10 inches, 230 pounds and Thomas is 6 foot 9 inches, 215 pounds.
Notes
-The Bulls are 29-23, 3rd in the Central division. The Raptors are 27-24, 1st in the Atlantic division.
-The Bulls are 20-6 at home. The Raptors are 9-17 on the road.
-The Bulls have won 6 of their last 10 games. The Raptors have won 8 of their last 10 games.